To validate the metamodels we define a set of transformations which enables one to create instances of the metamodels using as a starting point models in the ARIS toolset serialisation format (the ARIS markup language-AML). Business process modeling is the core technical sub-phase during which the process design and the process modeling techniques can be used in information systems. The diagrammatic and graphical representations to understand the business processes in a simple and appealing way is the core concept of BPMN 2.0.
![business process modelling languages business process modelling languages](https://i1.rgstatic.net/publication/288606669_Business_process_modeling_languages_supporting_collaborative_networks/links/576c733508aedb18f3eb2957/largepreview.png)
The metamodels serve as a starting point for the definition of the semantics of the language and allow the construction of tools to manage modelling, simulation, analysis and transformation of organisational models and business processes. If you have heard about BPMN 2.0, which stands for Business Process Modeling Notation 2.0, then you know how business processes have evolved in the present time within the periphery of the Industry 4.0. The application of this approach results on well-defined language metamodels, clarifying the language’s main modelling elements and their relationships. This approach uses information obtained with user interactions over the modelling environment called ARIS toolset and extra information from tool documentation. This kind of languages usually offer a number of visual constructs that IT designers use to model business behaviour. In this paper, we propose an approach to excavate and define the metamodels of the organisational modelling and business process modelling languages of ARIS method. The term Workflow Process Modelling Languages includes all process modelling methods and techniques used for capturing high-level representations of business processes within the work- flow context. We also show that a combination of two languages, in particular SRML and BPMN, appears to be better suited for combined process and rule modeling than any of these modeling languages used independently.Uncovering the organisational modelling and business process modelling languages in the ARIS method Uncovering the organisational modelling and business process modelling languages in the ARIS method We then show how such a layer can be aligned with common process modeling languages and thus provides a seamless integration with more advanced Business. The outcome of this study shows that no single language is internally complete with respect to the BWW representation model. In our analysis, we focus on the aspects of maximum ontological completeness and minimum ontological overlap. Especially internationally operating companies benefit from an easier.
![business process modelling languages business process modelling languages](https://www.enisa.europa.eu/topics/threat-risk-management/risk-management/current-risk/business-process-integration/files/adoit_legend.jpg)
We compare their BWW representation capabilities with those of four popular conceptual process modeling languages. It is now possible to design business processes in multiple languages at the same time. We perform a representational analysis of four rule modeling specifications: The Simple Rule Markup Language (SRML), the Semantic Web Rules Language (SWRL), the Production Rule Representation (PRR), and the Semantics of Business Vocabulary and Business Rules (SBVR) specification.
![business process modelling languages business process modelling languages](https://i1.rgstatic.net/publication/3480632_Translating_a_typical_business_process_modelling_language_to_a_Web_Services_Ontology_through_lightweight_mapping/links/0046352b0263fa7fba000000/largepreview.png)
In this paper, we use the Bunge–Wand–Weber (BWW) representation theory to compare the representation capabilities of process and rule modeling languages. Understanding the relationship between the two modeling types would allow organizations to maximize synergies, avoid content duplication, and thus reduce their overall modeling effort. Keywords: Business Process Modeling, BPM, Domain Specific Languages, DSL. To date, their synergies and overlap are under-researched. It was maintained by the Business Process Management Initiative (BPMI) until June 2005 when BPMI and OMG (Object Management Group) announced the merger of their respective Business Process Management (BPM) activities to form the Business Modeling and Integration Domain Task Force (BMI DTF). Process modeling and rule modeling languages are both used to document organizational policies and procedures.